Home Contact Biography Works Media News

Jane Recommends
Who Hates Whom / Bob Harris

Who Hates Whom: Well-Armed Fanatics, Intractable Conflicts, and Various Things Blowing Up A Woefully Incomplete Guide by Bob Harris

"The geopolitical equivalent of scorecards that get hawked at ball games. Only Bob could make a user’s guide to our increasingly hostile world this absorbing, this breezy, and—ultimately—this hopeful."
~ Ken Jennings, author of Brainiac

 

Jane in Print
Serenity Found: More Unauthorized Essays on Joss Whedon's Firefly Universe, edited by Jane Espenson

Flirting with Pride and Prejudice: Fresh Perspectives on the Original Chick-Lit Masterpiece, edited by Jennifer Crusie and including Jane Espenson's short story, "Georgiana"

Finding Serenity: Anti-Heroes, Lost Shepherds and Space Hookers in Joss Whedon's Firefly, edited by Jane Espenson and Glenn Yeffeth

 
Jane in DVD

Jane in DVD

Now Available:
+Battlestar Galactica Season 3
+Dinosaurs Seasons 3 & 4
+Gilmore Girls Season 4
+Buffy: The Chosen Collection
+Tru Calling
+Firefly
+Angel: Limited Edition Collectors Set

Jane in Progress

 

Home » Archives » June 2008 » The Ages of Man
[Previous entry: "The Sparkle Rule"] [Next entry: "How to Vancouver"]

06/11/2008: The Ages of Man


Amy in Colorado writes in with two questions. Here is one of them.

How does this happen? I recently watched a movie [...] where the time-line/histories of the main characters made no sense at all. Early in the film, the main character explains that her mother never liked her husband because they met when she was 19 [...] Then, 3 weeks after the husband dies, she has a 40th birthday. [...] Later, she's all upset and yells that her husband was only 35 when he died. [...] Then, there is a flashback scene from their first meeting... [and]... there's no way he's 15. So, am I to believe that not a single person involved with the movie noticed the obvious contradictions???

Yes, it's possible that they didn't notice. Or, more likely, when they noticed after the fact, they felt that making some kind of fix would lead to some worse consequence -- if they made the husband older when he died, for example, the poignancy of his loss would be lessened, perhaps, and that would be worse than a logic flaw that most viewers won't catch.

This kind of thing happens all the time, more often on tv shows -- in which the backstory evolves over years -- than features, and there's good reason for it. The problem is that scripts aren't imagined, written and then shot. They're imagined, then re-imagined, written, then rewritten by others, then reconceptualized during preproduction, tinkered with on-set without the writer present, then totally re-imagined one more time in the editing room -- again, usually without the writer being there. I don't know the movie in question, but I wonder if it's possible that the flashback scene was added late in the process, after the rest of the material was filmed and hard to change. Or, perhaps, the woman's birthday was originally a 30th birthday, but the casting of the female lead made that implausible? They may have decided that the funky math was better than trying to age down their actress. Or maybe they originally were going to delete the birthday reference, then added the "met when I was 19" line, then later realized they needed the birthday for some other reason... Or who knows what. In the chaos of making a movie, the logic of the script is often -- not ignored, but rather, jettisoned in favor of more immediate crises.

There are lots and lots of things like this that can happen between page and screen. Actors get haircuts or boob jobs during a shoot, or some location is suddenly unavailable or the writer forgets some choice they made weeks earlier and writes something that contradicts it.

Remember that big fight between Buffy and Spike in which the whole point of the scene was that Spike could suddenly survive (and fight) in sunlight, but the whole scene was shot in the deep shade? Well, the day grew late and the shadows grew long. Everyone noticed it, but there was little that could be done.

After you've seen this happen to a few of your scripts, you may start to try to make them production-proof. I remember on one sitcom early in my career I was told, "never write a scene that requires a specific prop unless you have one in your garage." Now, I've never had any problem, ever, with the prop people failing to supply what I needed, but clearly the guy who gave me that advice had. The problem with trying to write protectively is that trying to prevent problems leads to overwriting in which everything is laid out too clearly, or to boring writing in which everything is on an easy-to-control interior set without crowds or too much action.

In a way, those of you at the "aspiring" stage of your tv writing careers are lucky in that you're writing to be read, not produced. You have no other writer and no panic-pressed writing of your own that will introduce contradictions, and, like a novelist, you have the imaginations of your readers to deal with, not the vagaries of nature and a crew. Of course, part of the assignment is to write a script that appears producible, so you can't go nuts with a chariot-race in every act, but you can at least keep your characters' ages straight, and rely on sunshine when you need it!

Lunch: That strange strawberry-spinach salad again. Get the strawberries on the side and avoid the pink dressing.

Addendum: I keep thinking of new ways this could've happened. Maybe the birthday was originally supposed to be years after the husband's death, not weeks, but in the moment they decided that it would really only play with fresh grief. This feels quite likely to me.


 

Get Blog Updates Via Email

Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

 

Links
Walt Disney Writing Fellowship Program
UC Berkeley
Jane recommends you also visit BobHarris.com

 

Home
Archives

June 2008
SMTWTFS

Valid XHTML 1.0!

Powered By Greymatter
Greymatter Forums


Home | News | Works | Biography | Frequently Asked Questions

Site design Copyright © PM Carlson
This is a fan site owned and operated entirely by PM Carlson with the cooperation and assistance of Jane Espenson. This site is not affiliated in any way with Mutant Enemy, 20th Century Fox or ABC.